Skip to main content

Another little distraction...

 

My New Year's resolution this year (and that seems a VERY long time ago now!) was to 'Finish Things', and by inference not get distracted by new and shiny projects. Those of you who know me well will be laughing already, as my list of projects is long, and largely unfinished, hence the resolution...

And I had been doing quite well, despite various temptations along the way. When I first heard of 'Never Mind the Billhooks' a few months ago I consoled myself that I already had a lot of 'Wars of the Roses' stuff form way back when, and the worst that could happen would be that I needed to rebase them. NMTB does use an unusual basing system, so when the rules were published I got out my old, largely Foundry, army and started having a look. And I even got some spare castings and painted them up - these are partly Foundry and partly Citadel IIRC...

But times have moved on, and the quality of sculpting has moved on, and more importantly I've got a bit better at painting, so I wasn't entirely happy with what I had. the ones below are from my older collection, and they tend to garish colours, which don't seem entirely medieval to my eye any more.


Luckily I had a couple of boxes of Perry Miniatures new plastics lying around, as you do, the Infantry set, and the continental mercenaries. These latter were brought with the idea that I might one day do the Battle of Stoke Field as it is local to me, and one of the few battlefields I have had time to walk in the past.

First efforts were a few crossbowmen, from the mercenary set:



... in NMTB they count as skirmishers, hence the bases, and I used fairly random livery colours. Martin Schwartz at Stoke Field had a largely German force, so I figured they might be in any colours. When I come to do some more pikemen from that set I will maybe go for a more Swiss blue and white combo.

Then for the main force I have so far managed some billmen and archers, this time in the Earl of Lincoln's colours of blue and yellow, for earlier parts of the wars they can be Suffolk's (his father), so effectively the same retinue:



I've also done a few accessories so far, to fit the game's options for defensive sharpened stakes, a Warbases cart for arrow supplies, and a few counters for arrow supply - see Stephen Woods blog which I basically copied for the counters..

So now I have the beginnings of an army, quite a few models left in my two Perry boxes, and a few Foundry castings which are still pretty good quality, but am going to get back to my main projects for a little while before the lure of these gets to me again...


Labels:

Comments

  1. Happy Wanderer16 November 2020 at 23:30

    Very nice. They look like they're painted 'block colors with a wash over the top' - ? Could you give us a quick 'colors and finish' you used on these...nice work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swedish Napoleonic Army - the most obscure you can get?

 My fascination with the Swedish Napoleonic army goes back to the early 80's with the publication of WJ Rawkin's book on the subject. At the time I thought it was the most obscure thing I had ever come across, but I was also fascinated by how different the illustrations looked from the other uniforms of the time, and I soon determined that eventually I would have a wargames army to represent this proud group of men. I also got the Rawkins book on the Neapolitan army, but although that was also pretty fascinating, they were pretty much chocolate box soldiers and a Prince's plaything, whilst the Swedes has actually fought an entire war against the Russians during this period that I'd also never heard of.  The Swedish - Russian War 1808-9 Actually this is only really obscure to those of us who have been brought up in the English education system, which continues to pretty much ignore the rest of the world, unless we were invading or colonising it. I suppose this is true of...
2 comments
Read more

The loss of a friend - a tribute to Duncan Macfarlane

  This is based on a few words I said at the gathering at the Sir John Borlase Warren following Duncan's funeral last week. Others were more eloquent, Dan Faulconbridge and Richard Tyndall both spoke movingly at the funeral itself, John Stallard quoted Bryan Ansell in saying that Duncan's magazines had probably been instrumental in saving the historical side of the bobby during the 80s and early 90s and making it what it is today. Rich Clarke and Peter Dennis also paid tribute to the influence he has had on the modern wargames scene, both here and internationally. But these are my personal thoughts and memories: Duncan was a man in many ways set firmly in the past, his knowledge of history, particularly military history, was both deep and diverse, but I believe he was also a very modern man, being what we would nowadays call a great networker, a facilitator, and an influencer. In the days since his sudden death (and we now know it was from heart failure) many have paid tribute ...
1 comment
Read more